A Simple Key For family law cases Unveiled
A Simple Key For family law cases Unveiled
Blog Article
five. Discovered Deputy Prosecutor General along with counsel to the complainant further argued that during the investigation with the case the petitioner Mst. Mubeena Bibi led on the recovery of sleeping products on fourteen.02.2018. The report of Punjab Forensic Science Agency, Lahore has actually been created before the Court wherein the sleeping tablets were declared to be comprising “Alprazolam and Procyclidin” whereas “Diazepam” and “Chloroquin” were detected in the liver although not inside the belly. Consequently, the recovery of reported sleeping tablets hardly connects the petitioner Mst. Mubeena Bibi with the crime complained of. Learned Deputy Prosecutor General in addition to counsel for your complainant have also argued that during the investigation on the case the petitioner Bhoora led into the recovery of the motorcycle.
ninety three . Const. P. 642/2023 (D.B.) Fatima Noor V/S Dow University of Health Science and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi Coming into the main case, Additionally it is a nicely-proven proposition of law that when an inquiry is conducted on charges of misconduct by a public servant, the Court is concerned with determining whether the inquiry was held by a competent officer or whether rules of natural justice are complied with. Whether the findings or conclusions are based on some evidence, the authority entrusted with the power to hold inquiry has jurisdiction, power, and authority to succeed in a finding of fact or conclusion. But that finding must be based on some evidence. Neither the technical rules nor proof of a fact or evidence during the Stricto-Sensu, use to disciplinary proceedings. When the authority accepts that evidence and summary receive support therefrom, the disciplinary authority is entitled to hold that the delinquent officer is guilty of your charge, however, that is matter on the procedure provided under the relevant rules instead of otherwise, for that reason that the Court in its power of judicial review does not act as appellate authority to re-value the evidence and to reach at its independent findings on the evidence.
4. It's been noticed by this Court that there can be a delay of someday inside the registration of FIR which hasn't been explained by the complainant. Moreover, there is no eye-witness with the alleged occurrence along with the prosecution is counting on the witnesses of extra judicial confession. The evidence of extra judicial confession from the petitioners is tendered by Ghulam Dastigir and Mohammad Akram through their statements recorded under Section 161, Cr.P.C., on 06.02.2018. Both of them namely Ghulam Dastigir and Mohammad Akram took place to generally be the real brothers on the deceased but they didn't respond in the slightest degree to your confessional statements of your petitioners and calmly noticed them leaving, a person after the other, without even moving an inch. They have not mentioned in their statements that the accused held some weapon when they visited them to confess their guilt about the murder of Ghulam Farid which could have precluded these witnesses from apprehending the petitioners. Their conduct does not glance much inspiring or natural. The petitioner, namely, Mst. Mubeena Bibi was arrested on 14.02.2018 and there is not any explanation concerning why her arrest was not effected after making of your alleged extra judicial confession. It's been held on a lot of events that extra judicial confession of an accused can be a weak variety of evidence which could be manoeuvred with the prosecution in almost any case where direct connecting evidence does not come their way. The prosecution is also depending on the evidence of Murid Hussain and Muhammad Afzal which is equally fragile, as both the witnesses Murid Hussain and Muhammad Afzal did not say a word as to existence of some light with the place, where they allegedly noticed the petitioners alongside one another with a motorcycle at four.
Deterrence: The dread of severe effects, which includes capital punishment, is meant to discourage prospective criminals from committing murder. This deterrent effect is essential in reducing the event of intentional killings.
These past decisions are called "case regulation", or precedent. Stare decisis—a Latin phrase meaning "Enable the decision stand"—could be the principle by which judges are bound to this sort of past decisions, drawing on established judicial authority to formulate their positions.
four. It goes without declaring that observations made hereinabove are only tentative in nature and strictly confined for the disposal of fast bail petition.
Retribution: Section 302 PPC also serves the purpose of retribution, where society seeks justice for the loss of a life. It allows the legal system to impose a proportional punishment within the offender, ensuring They're held accountable for their actions.
A year later, Frank and Adel have a similar trouble. When they sue their landlord, the court must use the previous court’s decision in making use of the regulation. This example of case regulation refers to two cases listened to from the state court, at the same level.
department concerned shall offer the complete set of ACRs in the concerned officer to DPC properly in advance cases for promotin(Promotion)
The law of necessity regarded and upheld by Pakistan's highest judicial body has proved an honorable protection for military adventure in civil government.it was the illegal action called legislation of necessity..
How much sway case legislation holds might change by jurisdiction, and by the precise circumstances of your current case. To explore this concept, look at the following case legislation definition.
this Court is still left with no option check here but to direct the respondents to inform the promotion on the petitioner in next rank .(Promotion)
Because of this, just citing the case is more likely to annoy a judge than help the party’s case. Think about it as calling somebody to tell them you’ve found their misplaced phone, then telling them you live in these kinds of-and-this kind of neighborhood, without actually supplying them an address. Driving round the neighborhood wanting to find their phone is probably going for being more frustrating than it’s well worth.
The decision further directed the government of Pakistan to ascertain a commission of internationally known and acknowledged scientists to review and rule on upcoming grid station projects. In addition, the Court ordered WAPDA to immediately introduce public consultation and objection procedures for all projects concerning grid stations and power traces.